samsung: lose market share

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose market share 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(samsung, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nokia, lose market share)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(samsung, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nokia, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nokia, lose market share)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(samsung, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(samsung, lose market share)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(samsung, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(samsung, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(samsung, lose market share)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(samsung, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(samsung, lose market share)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(samsung, lose market share) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(nokia, lose market share)