samuel de champlain: was important to development of new france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explorer
Weight: 0.50
, missionary
Weight: 0.39
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.32
, priest
Weight: 0.26
, geologist
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to development of new france 1.00
was important in development of new france 1.00
was important in development of france 0.98
was important to development of france 0.98
be important to new france 0.94
was important to france 0.91
be important to france 0.90
be called father of new france 0.87
father of new france 0.86
was sent to new france 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was important in development of new france)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was important in development of france)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of france)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important in development of new france)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important in development of france)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was important in development of france)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of france)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was important in development of new france)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of france)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, be important to new france)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to france)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, be important to new france)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, be important to new france)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, be important to france)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to france)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to france)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, be important to france)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, be important to france)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, be called father of new france)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, was sent to new france)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(samuel de champlain, father of new france)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was sent to new france)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, was sent to new france)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, be called father of new france)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, be called father of new france)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(samuel de champlain, father of new france)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, father of new france)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important in development of new france)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of france)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, be important to new france)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important in development of france)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, be called father of new france)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to france)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, father of new france)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, be important to france)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was sent to new france)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(samuel de champlain, was important to development of new france)