san antonio: was built in texas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, los angeles
Weight: 0.63
, austin
Weight: 0.62
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.40
, san francisco
Weight: 0.40
, san diego
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was built in texas 1.00
be important to texas 0.91
is tx 0.80
was built 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(san antonio, was built in texas)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(austin, is tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(san antonio, was built in texas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(austin, is tx)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york, was built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(austin, is tx)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was built)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(san jose, was built)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(austin, is tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, was built)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(san jose, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(san jose, was built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(san antonio, was built in texas)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(san antonio, is tx)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is tx)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(san antonio, be important to texas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(san antonio, is tx)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(san antonio, was built)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(san antonio, was built)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(san antonio, was built)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(san antonio, be important to texas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, be important to texas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(san antonio, be important to texas)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is tx)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(san antonio, was built in texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(austin, is tx)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san jose, was built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(austin, is tx)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(san antonio, was built in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)