san diego: have good weather

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.75
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, mexico
Weight: 0.66
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.44
, san antonio
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.37
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, vancouver
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have good weather 1.00
have consitencly good weather 1.00
have consitencly weather 0.97
have weather 0.97
have perfect weather 0.92
have warmer weather than seattle 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(san diego, have good weather)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(san diego, have consitencly good weather)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(san diego, have consitencly good weather)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(san diego, have consitencly weather)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(san diego, have weather)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(san diego, have weather)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(san diego, have consitencly weather)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(san diego, have consitencly good weather)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(san diego, have consitencly weather)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(san diego, have weather)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(san diego, have perfect weather)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(san diego, have perfect weather)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(san diego, have perfect weather)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san diego, have perfect weather)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(san diego, have warmer weather than seattle)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(san diego, have warmer weather than seattle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(san diego, have warmer weather than seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san diego, have consitencly good weather)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(san diego, have weather)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(san diego, have consitencly weather)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(san diego, have warmer weather than seattle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san diego, have good weather)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(san diego, have good weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(san diego, have good weather)