san francisco: be built on hills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be built on hills 1.00
have hills 0.93
have many hills 0.90
be on hill 0.83
have mountains 0.82
be built on lake 0.82
was built 0.80
have more mountains 0.80
is hilly 0.80
was built in place 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(north america, have more mountains)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(north america, have mountains)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san diego, was built in place)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(north america, have mountains)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in place)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(north america, have more mountains)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in place)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(north america, have more mountains)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(north america, have mountains)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is hilly)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(san jose, was built)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(north america, have more mountains)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(north america, have mountains)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san diego, was built in place)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(seattle, is hilly)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(seattle, is hilly)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(san jose, was built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(san jose, was built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have hills)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be on hill)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(san francisco, be on hill)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(san francisco, have hills)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(san francisco, have hills)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(san francisco, be on hill)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have hills)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be on hill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(san francisco, have many hills)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(san francisco, have many hills)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have many hills)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, was built)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(san francisco, is hilly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(san francisco, was built)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is hilly)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is hilly)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(san francisco, is hilly)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(north america, have mountains)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in place)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(north america, have more mountains)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(seattle, is hilly)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san jose, was built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(north america, have mountains)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in place)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(north america, have more mountains)