san francisco: be covered in feces

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in feces 1.00
be covered in smoke 0.78
be covered in ash 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be covered in ash)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, be covered in smoke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(vancouver, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vancouver, be covered in smoke)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in ash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(seattle, be covered in ash)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(seattle, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(seattle, be covered in smoke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(san francisco, be covered in feces)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be covered in feces)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san francisco, be covered in feces)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(seattle, be covered in ash)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(vancouver, be covered in smoke)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be covered in feces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(seattle, be covered in smoke)