san francisco: be north of los angeles

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, san antonio
Weight: 0.40
, japan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be north of los angeles 1.00
be west of texas 0.76
be know as la 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(los angeles, be know as la)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(san francisco, be north of los angeles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be know as la)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be know as la)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(los angeles, be know as la)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be north of los angeles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(san francisco, be north of los angeles)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be west of texas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be west of texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be north of los angeles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(san francisco, be north of los angeles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(los angeles, be know as la)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(san francisco, be north of los angeles)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(los angeles, be know as la)