san francisco: get in summer

Related concepts

Parents	san diego Weight: 0.83 , los angeles Weight: 0.74 , mexico city Weight: 0.69 , north america Weight: 0.67
Siblings	san jose Weight: 0.80 , vancouver Weight: 0.62 , des moines Weight: 0.61 , seattle Weight: 0.60 , exploratorium Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property	Similarity
get in summer	1.00
get in winter	0.90
have spring	0.88
be dry in summer	0.87
be city of spring	0.84
tend cool in summer	0.84
have summers	0.81
have dry summers	0.81
have spring forward	0.80
be warm in winter	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(mexico city, be city of spring) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(san francisco, get in summer)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(north america, have spring) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(san francisco, get in summer)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(north america, have spring forward) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(san francisco, get in summer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(north america, have spring)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(north america, have spring forward)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(mexico city, be city of spring)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(north america, have spring)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be city of spring)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(north america, have spring forward)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(seattle, be dry in summer)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(vancouver, have dry summers)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(vancouver, get in winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(mexico city, be city of spring) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(san francisco, get in summer)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(north america, have spring) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(san francisco, get in summer)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(north america, have spring forward) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(san francisco, get in summer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(vancouver, get in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(vancouver, get in winter)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(seattle, be dry in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(seattle, be dry in summer)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(vancouver, have dry summers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(vancouver, have dry summers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(san francisco, get in summer)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(san francisco, tend cool in summer)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(san francisco, tend cool in summer)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, tend cool in summer)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(san francisco, tend cool in summer)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(san francisco, be warm in winter)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(san francisco, be warm in winter)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(san francisco, be warm in winter)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be warm in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(san francisco, get in summer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(north america, have spring)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(north america, have spring forward)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(mexico city, be city of spring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(vancouver, have dry summers)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(seattle, be dry in summer)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(vancouver, get in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(north america, have spring)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(north america, have spring forward)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(san francisco, get in summer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(mexico city, be city of spring)