san francisco: has color green

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color green 1.00
has color yellow 0.90
has color white 0.89
be yellow today 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(san diego, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(san francisco, has color green)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(los angeles, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(san francisco, has color green)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(los angeles, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(san diego, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, has color yellow)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san diego, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color yellow)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has color yellow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(san diego, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(los angeles, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(san francisco, has color green)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(san jose, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(san jose, has color yellow)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(seattle, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(seattle, has color yellow)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(seattle, has color white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(san francisco, has color green)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(san francisco, has color yellow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be yellow today)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(san francisco, be yellow today)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be yellow today)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san francisco, be yellow today)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(san francisco, has color yellow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(san francisco, has color yellow)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color yellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(san francisco, has color green)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(san diego, has color yellow)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(los angeles, has color yellow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(san jose, has color yellow)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seattle, has color yellow)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(seattle, has color white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(san diego, has color yellow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(san francisco, has color green)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(los angeles, has color yellow)