san francisco: have famous areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
have famous areas 1.00
has physical part areas 0.82
is famous 0.81
be most densely populated area in north america 0.77
have many urban islands 0.76
be similar to most big cities 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mexico city, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mexico city, be similar to most big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mexico city, be most densely populated area in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be most densely populated area in north america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be similar to most big cities)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be most densely populated area in north america)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is famous)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is famous)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be similar to most big cities)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(san jose, have many urban islands)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mexico city, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mexico city, be similar to most big cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mexico city, be most densely populated area in north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(seattle, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(seattle, have famous areas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(seattle, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(seattle, is famous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vancouver, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(vancouver, is famous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(san jose, have many urban islands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(san jose, have many urban islands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(san francisco, have famous areas)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(san francisco, is famous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is famous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(san francisco, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, have famous areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mexico city, be most densely populated area in north america)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be similar to most big cities)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mexico city, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san jose, have many urban islands)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(seattle, have famous areas)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(seattle, is famous)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vancouver, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mexico city, be most densely populated area in north america)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be similar to most big cities)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(san francisco, have famous areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mexico city, is famous)