san francisco: have many hills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
have many hills 1.00
have hills 0.97
be built on hills 0.90
have mountains 0.87
have more mountains 0.87
is hilly 0.81
be on hill 0.80
is valley 0.79
have many urban islands 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(north america, have more mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(san francisco, have many hills)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(north america, have mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(san francisco, have many hills)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(north america, have mountains)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(north america, have more mountains)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(north america, have more mountains)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(north america, have mountains)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is valley)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is hilly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(san jose, have many urban islands)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(north america, have more mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have many hills)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(north america, have mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have many hills)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(seattle, is hilly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(seattle, is hilly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(san jose, is valley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(san jose, is valley)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(san jose, have many urban islands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(san jose, have many urban islands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(san francisco, have many hills)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have hills)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(san francisco, have hills)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(san francisco, have hills)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have hills)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be on hill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(san francisco, be on hill)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(san francisco, be on hill)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be on hill)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(san francisco, is hilly)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is hilly)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is hilly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(san francisco, is hilly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(san francisco, have many hills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(north america, have mountains)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(north america, have more mountains)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(seattle, is hilly)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(san jose, is valley)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san jose, have many urban islands)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(north america, have mountains)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(san francisco, have many hills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(north america, have more mountains)