sanction: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents penalty
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, punishment
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.58
Siblings suspension
Weight: 0.75
, dismissal
Weight: 0.69
, contempt
Weight: 0.66
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.65
, ban
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is good thing 0.97
is thing 0.94
is even thing 0.91
is okay 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
is weird 0.79
happen 0.75
be such problem single year 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(punishment, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(punishment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(penalty, is thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(punishment, is thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(penalty, is even thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(penalty, be such problem single year)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(punishment, is thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(penalty, is thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(penalty, is even thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(punishment, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(punishment, is bad thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(penalty, be such problem single year)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(penalty, be such problem single year)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(penalty, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is good thing)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is bad thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(penalty, is even thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(penalty, is thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(contempt, happen)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, is okay)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(punishment, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(punishment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(penalty, is thing)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(punishment, is thing)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(penalty, is even thing)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(penalty, be such problem single year)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(imprisonment, is okay)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, is okay)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(contempt, happen)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(contempt, happen)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(suspension, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sanction, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sanction, is thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sanction, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sanction, is thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sanction, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sanction, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(punishment, is thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(penalty, is thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(penalty, is even thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(punishment, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(punishment, is good thing)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(penalty, be such problem single year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(contempt, happen)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(imprisonment, is okay)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(punishment, is thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(penalty, is thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(penalty, is even thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(punishment, is bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(punishment, is good thing)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sanction, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(penalty, be such problem single year)