sand dune: be eroded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.54
Siblings shoreline
Weight: 0.35
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.34
, beach
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be eroded 1.00
be protected from erosion 0.79
slow erosion 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(beach, be eroded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(beach, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(beach, be eroded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sand dune, be eroded)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sand dune, slow erosion)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sand dune, slow erosion)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sand dune, slow erosion)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, slow erosion)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be protected from erosion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be eroded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sand dune, be eroded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be eroded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beach, be eroded)