sand dune: is protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.54
Siblings shoreline
Weight: 0.35
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.34
, beach
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is protected 1.00
need protected 0.96
be protected from erosion 0.86
be in florida protected 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sand dune, is protected)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(sand dune, need protected)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, need protected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sand dune, need protected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sand dune, need protected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, is protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sand dune, is protected)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sand dune, is protected)