sand dune: need protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.54
Siblings shoreline
Weight: 0.35
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.34
, beach
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need protected 1.00
is protected 0.96
be protected from erosion 0.84
be in florida protected 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sand dune, need protected)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sand dune, is protected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sand dune, is protected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sand dune, is protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sand dune, be protected from erosion)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sand dune, be in florida protected)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, is protected)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, be protected from erosion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sand dune, need protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sand dune, need protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sand dune, need protected)