sandwich: taste better cut diagonally

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut diagonally taste better 1.00
taste better cut diagonally 1.00
cut diagonally taste 0.99
taste cut diagonally 0.99
is cut diagonally 0.95
taste cut into triangles 0.83
taste better cut 0.82
cut taste better 0.82
taste better in triangles 0.80
cut taste 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)