sap: be better than other erp solutions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents software company
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.55
Siblings syrup
Weight: 0.31
, oil filter
Weight: 0.31
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.31
, kleenex
Weight: 0.30
, pure water
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than other erp solutions 1.00
be better than erp solutions 0.99
be better than other erp 0.92
be better than erp 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sap, be better than other erp solutions)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sap, be better than erp solutions)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sap, be better than erp solutions)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sap, be better than erp solutions)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sap, be better than other erp)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(sap, be better than erp)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sap, be better than erp)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sap, be better than other erp)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sap, be better than erp)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sap, be better than other erp)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sap, be better than erp solutions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sap, be better than other erp)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sap, be better than erp)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sap, be better than other erp solutions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sap, be better than other erp solutions)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sap, be better than other erp solutions)