sarah: be famous in idaho

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, friend
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.59
, woman
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gordon
Weight: 0.36
, kate
Weight: 0.35
, john smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous in idaho 1.00
is famous 0.78
is ashcroft famous 0.78
is singley famous 0.78
be famous winnemucca 0.78
be riani famous 0.78
be famous 0.78
be famous goode 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(john smith, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(gordon, is famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(gordon, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gordon, is famous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(john smith, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(john smith, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sarah, be famous winnemucca)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(sarah, is ashcroft famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sarah, be famous goode)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sarah, is ashcroft famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sarah, is singley famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sarah, is ashcroft famous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sarah, is singley famous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sarah, be famous winnemucca)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sarah, be famous winnemucca)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sarah, is singley famous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sarah, be famous goode)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sarah, be famous goode)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sarah, be riani famous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sarah, is ashcroft famous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sarah, is singley famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sarah, be famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sarah, be riani famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sarah, be riani famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sarah, be famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sarah, be famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous winnemucca)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous goode)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be riani famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sarah, be famous in idaho)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gordon, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be famous in idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(john smith, is famous)