sarah: is whitman important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, friend
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.59
, woman
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gordon
Weight: 0.36
, william james
Weight: 0.35
, kate
Weight: 0.35
, john smith
Weight: 0.35
, edmund burke
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is whitman important 1.00
is whitman 0.95
is helen whitman important 0.89
is helen whitman 0.85
be palin part of election 2012 0.77
be palin part 0.75
was fulton important 0.75
was bradlee fulton important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sarah, is whitman important)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sarah, is helen whitman important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sarah, is helen whitman important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sarah, is helen whitman important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sarah, was bradlee fulton important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sarah, be palin part of election 2012)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sarah, was fulton important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sarah, is helen whitman important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sarah, was bradlee fulton important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sarah, be palin part of election 2012)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sarah, was fulton important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sarah, be palin part of election 2012)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(sarah, was bradlee fulton important)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(sarah, was fulton important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be palin part of election 2012)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sarah, was fulton important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sarah, was bradlee fulton important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sarah, is whitman important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sarah, is whitman important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sarah, is whitman important)