sarah: was important to history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, friend
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.59
, woman
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gordon
Weight: 0.36
, kate
Weight: 0.35
, john smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to history 1.00
was important to american history 0.88
be important winnemucca 0.81
was important in bible 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sarah, was important to history)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sarah, was important to american history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sarah, was important to american history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sarah, was important to american history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sarah, was important to american history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(sarah, be important winnemucca)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sarah, be important winnemucca)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sarah, be important winnemucca)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sarah, was important in bible)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sarah, be important winnemucca)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sarah, was important in bible)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sarah, was important in bible)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sarah, was important in bible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sarah, was important to history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sarah, was important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sarah, was important to history)