sasha: is bad name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.62
, child
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
, girl
Weight: 0.50
, woman
Weight: 0.50
Siblings hank williams
Weight: 0.35
, sylvia plath
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad name 1.00
has state name 0.87
be short name for alexander 0.80
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sasha, is bad name)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sasha, be short name for alexander)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sasha, be short name for alexander)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sasha, be short name for alexander)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sasha, be short name for alexander)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sasha, has state name)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sasha, has state name)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(sasha, has state name)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sasha, has state name)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sasha, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sasha, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sasha, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(sasha, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sasha, is bad name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sasha, is bad name)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sasha, is bad name)