satellite: be useful predicting

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.61 , electronic device Weight: 0.61 , internet service provider Weight: 0.60 , time Weight: 0.58
Siblings	cable Weight: 0.63 , antenna Weight: 0.35 , digital camera Weight: 0.35 , network device Weight: 0.34 , computer network Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be useful predicting	1.00
be used in forecasting	0.86
help in weather predictions	0.79
help in forecasting weather conditions	0.79
be useful	0.76
is useful	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(electronic device, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(satellite, be useful predicting)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(device, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(satellite, be useful predicting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(device, is useful)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(electronic device, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is useful)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(device, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(computer network, is useful)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(antenna, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(electronic device, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(device, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(antenna, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(antenna, is useful)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(computer network, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(computer network, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(satellite, be useful predicting)

Similarity expansion

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(satellite, is useful)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(satellite, is useful)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(satellite, is useful)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(satellite, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(satellite, be useful predicting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(device, is useful)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(antenna, is useful)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(computer network, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(device, is useful)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(satellite, be useful predicting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)