sauce: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot sauce
Weight: 0.73
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.69
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.68
, soup
Weight: 0.63
, liquid
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tabasco sauce
Weight: 0.43
, gumbo
Weight: 0.36
, tabasco
Weight: 0.36
, gravy
Weight: 0.36
, stew
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89
be better awp than skadoodle 0.86
is better day 0.82
taste better day 0.79
is good for 0.79
preserve better in environment 0.77
taste better next day 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(soup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tomato sauce, is better day)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(soup, taste better next day)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(soup, is better day)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(soup, taste better day)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(soup, is better day)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(soup, taste better day)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, is better day)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(soup, taste better next day)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soup, taste better day)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(soup, is better day)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(soup, taste better next day)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, is better day)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(stew, be better awp than skadoodle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, is better day)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tabasco, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tabasco, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gumbo, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gravy, is good for)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(soup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tomato sauce, is better day)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(soup, is better day)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(soup, taste better next day)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(soup, taste better day)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tabasco, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tabasco, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gumbo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gumbo, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tabasco, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(tabasco, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(stew, be better awp than skadoodle)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(stew, be better awp than skadoodle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(gravy, is good for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gravy, is good for)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, is better day)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(stew, is better day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sauce, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sauce, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sauce, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sauce, is quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, is quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sauce, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sauce, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(soup, taste better day)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(soup, is better day)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(soup, taste better next day)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, is better day)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tabasco, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stew, be better awp than skadoodle)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tabasco, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gumbo, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gravy, is good for)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(stew, is better day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(soup, is better day)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(soup, taste better day)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, is better day)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(soup, taste better next day)