saucepan: be at italian restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.59
, sauce
Weight: 0.47
, pan
Weight: 0.47
, item
Weight: 0.46
, kitchen
Weight: 0.45
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.35
, spatula
Weight: 0.34
, ladle
Weight: 0.34
, spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at italian restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.79
be at resturant 0.79
be at in restaurant 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kitchen, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(kitchen, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be at resturant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be at resturant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at resturant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at in restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kitchen, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(kitchen, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spoon, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at resturant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(spoon, be at resturant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(saucepan, be at italian restaurant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at resturant)