saucepan: be with lid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.59
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.58
, sauce
Weight: 0.47
, pan
Weight: 0.47
, item
Weight: 0.46
Siblings skillet
Weight: 0.36
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, wok
Weight: 0.35
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.35
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with lid 1.00
has physical part lids 0.78
have glass lids 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wok, has physical part lids)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wok, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wok, has physical part lids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(saucepan, be with lid)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, have glass lids)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, has physical part lids)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(saucepan, have glass lids)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(saucepan, have glass lids)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(saucepan, has physical part lids)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(saucepan, has physical part lids)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(saucepan, have glass lids)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(saucepan, has physical part lids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be with lid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(saucepan, be with lid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be with lid)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wok, has physical part lids)