saving: feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, topic
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.49
Siblings screen saver
Weight: 0.34
, giving
Weight: 0.31
, human life
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel good 1.00
is good idea 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be like 0.77
be good for economy 0.76
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(giving, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(giving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(giving, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(giving, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(saving, feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(saving, be like)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(saving, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(saving, is good idea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(saving, is good idea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(saving, be like)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(saving, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(saving, be like)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(saving, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(saving, is good idea)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(saving, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(saving, be good for economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(saving, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(saving, be good for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(saving, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(saving, is good idea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(saving, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(saving, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(saving, be like)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(saving, be good for economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(saving, be good for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(saving, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(giving, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(giving, has quality good)