savings account: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents savings
Weight: 0.86
, account
Weight: 0.71
, debit card
Weight: 0.70
, financial institution
Weight: 0.69
, investment
Weight: 0.67
Siblings capital account
Weight: 0.39
, bank statement
Weight: 0.35
, online banking
Weight: 0.34
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.34
, bank
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(debit card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(savings, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(debit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(savings, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(savings, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(savings, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(debit card, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(debit card, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(debit card, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(savings, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(debit card, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(savings, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(online banking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(capital account, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(debit card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(savings, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(debit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(savings, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(capital account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(capital account, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bank, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bank, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(online banking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(online banking, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bank, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(savings account, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(savings account, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(savings account, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(savings account, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(savings account, is best)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(savings account, is best)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(savings account, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(savings account, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(savings, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(savings, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(capital account, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(online banking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(savings, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(savings, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(savings account, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality good)