scab: feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, fungus
Weight: 0.46
, wound
Weight: 0.43
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.33
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.32
, bubonic plague
Weight: 0.32
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.32
, duodenal ulcer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel good 1.00
feel warm 0.83
taste good 0.80
has quality good 0.80
look like subarus 0.79
feel tight 0.79
get really itchy 0.79
feel itchy 0.77
is really itchy 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fungus, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scab, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fungus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scab, feel good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fungus, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fungus, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fungus, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fungus, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fungus, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(scab, feel good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fungus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(scab, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(genital herpes, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(genital herpes, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(scab, feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(scab, taste good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(scab, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(scab, taste good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(scab, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(scab, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(scab, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scab, get really itchy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scab, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(scab, look like subarus)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(scab, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(scab, look like subarus)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scab, look like subarus)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(scab, look like subarus)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scab, get really itchy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scab, feel tight)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel tight)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(scab, feel tight)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(scab, feel tight)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(scab, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(scab, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scab, get really itchy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(scab, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(scab, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scab, get really itchy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scab, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fungus, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fungus, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fungus, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scab, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fungus, has quality good)