scaling: be considered good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings shrinking
Weight: 0.39
, cutting
Weight: 0.33
, setting
Weight: 0.32
, trimming
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered good 1.00
feel good 0.81
be seen as bad thing 0.81
is very important 0.79
is bad anyway 0.79
is good idea 0.78
be seen as thing 0.78
be bad thing 0.77
has quality good 0.77
is called even 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(function, is called even)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(scaling, be considered good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(function, is called even)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(function, is called even)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cutting, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(setting, is very important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(trimming, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cutting, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shrinking, be seen as bad thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(shrinking, be seen as thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(function, is called even)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(scaling, be considered good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(shrinking, be seen as bad thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(shrinking, be seen as bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(shrinking, be seen as thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(shrinking, be seen as thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cutting, feel good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cutting, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(setting, is very important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(setting, is very important)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cutting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cutting, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(trimming, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(trimming, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cutting, be bad thing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cutting, be bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(scaling, be considered good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(scaling, be considered good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(function, is called even)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(shrinking, be seen as thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrinking, be seen as bad thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cutting, be bad thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cutting, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cutting, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(trimming, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(setting, is very important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(scaling, be considered good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(function, is called even)