scallop: has physical part fingers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, seafood
Weight: 0.60
, mollusk
Weight: 0.59
, shellfish
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.37
, crab
Weight: 0.37
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.37
, shrimp
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fingers 1.00
has physical part eyes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(scallop, has physical part fingers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(scallop, has physical part fingers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(scallop, has physical part fingers)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(scallop, has physical part eyes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(scallop, has physical part eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(scallop, has physical part eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(scallop, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scallop, has physical part fingers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(scallop, has physical part fingers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(scallop, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)