scanner: has color red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.68
, digital camera
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, printer
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, fingerprint
Weight: 0.34
, mri machine
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color red 1.00
yellow 0.84
use red lasers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, yellow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(ultrasound, yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(scanner, has color red)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(scanner, yellow)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(scanner, yellow)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(scanner, yellow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(scanner, yellow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(scanner, use red lasers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(scanner, use red lasers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(scanner, use red lasers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(scanner, use red lasers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scanner, has color red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scanner, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scanner, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ultrasound, yellow)