scanner: is input device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.68
, digital camera
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, printer
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, fingerprint
Weight: 0.34
, mri machine
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is input device 1.00
be used as input devices 0.94
be regarded as input device 0.93
be classified as input devices 0.91
is output device 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(digital camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scanner, is input device)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(printer, is output device)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(digital camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(scanner, is input device)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(printer, is output device)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(printer, is output device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scanner, is input device)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scanner, be used as input devices)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(scanner, be regarded as input device)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scanner, be used as input devices)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scanner, be regarded as input device)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(scanner, be used as input devices)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(scanner, be classified as input devices)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scanner, be classified as input devices)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(scanner, be classified as input devices)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(scanner, is output device)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is output device)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scanner, be used as input devices)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(scanner, be regarded as input device)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scanner, be classified as input devices)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(scanner, be regarded as input device)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(scanner, is output device)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scanner, is output device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is input device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scanner, is input device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(printer, is output device)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(scanner, is input device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)