schedule: be important for toddlers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.63
, reason
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.58
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.32
, host
Weight: 0.31
, duration
Weight: 0.31
, roll
Weight: 0.31
, start
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for toddlers 1.00
be important for preschoolers 0.88
was important to teens in 1950s 0.80
was important to teens 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(roll, was important to teens in 1950s)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(roll, was important to teens)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(roll, was important to teens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(roll, was important to teens)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(roll, was important to teens in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(roll, was important to teens in 1950s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(schedule, be important for toddlers)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(schedule, be important for preschoolers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(schedule, be important for preschoolers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(schedule, be important for preschoolers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(schedule, be important for preschoolers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(schedule, be important for toddlers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(schedule, be important for toddlers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(roll, was important to teens in 1950s)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(schedule, be important for toddlers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(roll, was important to teens)