scholarship: work for sport athletes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents award
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, tuition
Weight: 0.60
Siblings prize
Weight: 0.61
, undergraduate
Weight: 0.33
, medal
Weight: 0.33
, trophy
Weight: 0.32
, donation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
work for sport athletes 1.00
work for dual sport athletes 0.94
playing sports 0.81
be for world championships 0.77
be for world championships small 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(prize, be for world championships small)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prize, be for world championships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prize, be for world championships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(prize, be for world championships)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(prize, be for world championships small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(prize, be for world championships small)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(scholarship, work for sport athletes)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, work for dual sport athletes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, playing sports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(scholarship, playing sports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(scholarship, playing sports)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scholarship, playing sports)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(scholarship, work for dual sport athletes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(scholarship, work for dual sport athletes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scholarship, work for dual sport athletes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, work for sport athletes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(scholarship, work for sport athletes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(prize, be for world championships)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, work for sport athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(prize, be for world championships small)