school cafeteria: be used to feed tyke

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.66
, restaurant
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.57
, home
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cafeteria
Weight: 0.38
, gymnasium
Weight: 0.35
, public library
Weight: 0.35
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, deli
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to feed tyke 1.00
be used to feed child 0.82
be used to feed school child 0.80
be used to feed person 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(deli, be used to feed person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(deli, be used to feed person)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(deli, be used to feed person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(school cafeteria, be used to feed child)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(school cafeteria, be used to feed school child)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(school cafeteria, be used to feed child)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(school cafeteria, be used to feed school child)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(school cafeteria, be used to feed child)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(school cafeteria, be used to feed child)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(school cafeteria, be used to feed school child)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(school cafeteria, be used to feed school child)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(school cafeteria, be used to feed tyke)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deli, be used to feed person)