school: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public library
Weight: 0.68
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.65
, student
Weight: 0.64
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, college student
Weight: 0.61
Siblings teacher
Weight: 0.66
, good student
Weight: 0.47
, lander
Weight: 0.45
, elementary school
Weight: 0.39
, high school
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality organization 0.78
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(real estate, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(high school, is best)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(good student, has quality organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(school, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(good student, has quality organization)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(good student, has quality organization)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(high school, is best)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(high school, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(school, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(school, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(school, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(school, is best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(school, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(school, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(good student, has quality organization)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(high school, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(school, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)