science: affect technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect technology 1.00
be in technology 0.92
be related to technology 0.91
be in technology related 0.91
relate to technology 0.90
be used in technology 0.89
contribute to technology 0.89
relate with technology 0.89
improve technology 0.88
depend on technology 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, affect technology)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be in technology)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate to technology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, contribute to technology)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate with technology)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, improve technology)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, depend on technology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be in technology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate to technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, depend on technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, contribute to technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate with technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, be in technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(science, improve technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, be related to technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(science, be used in technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(science, be used in technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate to technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, contribute to technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate with technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(science, depend on technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(science, improve technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be in technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be related to technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(science, relate to technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(science, depend on technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, relate with technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(science, contribute to technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(science, improve technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, affect technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, affect technology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, affect technology)