science: be difficult from technology

Property	Similarity
be difficult from technology	1.00
be different from technology	0.89
be very important in technology	0.87
be used in technology	0.87
be in technology	0.87
affect technology	0.84
be in technology related	0.84
be related to technology	0.83
does help technology	0.83
relate with technology	0.81

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(science, be different from technology)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, be in technology)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be used in technology)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be in technology)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, affect technology)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(science, affect technology)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, does help technology)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(science, be used in technology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(science, be used in technology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(science, be different from technology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(science, be in technology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, relate with technology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, relate with technology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(science, does help technology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(science, be very important in technology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(science, be in technology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(science, affect technology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(science, be different from technology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(science, be related to technology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(science, does help technology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(science, affect technology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(science, relate with technology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(science, be different from technology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(science, be related to technology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(science, relate with technology)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(science, does help technology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(science, be very important in technology)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(science, be difficult from technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(science, be very important in technology)

Parents	vocation Weight: 0.62 , core Weight: 0.62 , mystery Weight: 0.61 , myth Weight: 0.61
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.83 , metaphysics Weight: 0.73 , mathematics Weight: 0.73 , quantum physics Weight: 0.71 , meteorology Weight: 0.70

science: be difficult from technology

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible