science: be distinguished from natural science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be distinguished from natural science 1.00
be distinguished from science 0.96
be different from science 0.83
be different as science 0.82
be considered science 0.81
be named science 0.81
be different from geography as science 0.80
is science 0.80
be called science 0.80
be used in science 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(science, be distinguished from natural science)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be called science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be called science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(science, be called science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(science, be called science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be distinguished from natural science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be distinguished from natural science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)