science: be in technology

Property	Similarity
be in technology	1.00
be used in technology	0.96
be in technology related	0.93
be related to technology	0.93
be different from technology	0.92
affect technology	0.92
be very important in technology	0.88
contribute to technology	0.87
be difficult from technology	0.87
relate to technology	0.87

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be used in technology)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(science, be different from technology)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, affect technology)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, contribute to technology)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, relate to technology)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(science, affect technology)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(science, be used in technology)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(science, be used in technology)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, contribute to technology)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(science, relate to technology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(science, be related to technology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(science, affect technology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(science, be different from technology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(science, be related to technology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(science, contribute to technology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(science, affect technology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(science, relate to technology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(science, be difficult from technology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(science, be very important in technology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(science, contribute to technology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(science, relate to technology)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(science, be different from technology)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(science, be different from technology)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(science, be difficult from technology)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(science, be very important in technology)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(science, be difficult from technology)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(science, be in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(science, be very important in technology)

Parents	vocation Weight: 0.62 , core Weight: 0.62 , mystery Weight: 0.61 , myth Weight: 0.61
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.83 , metaphysics Weight: 0.73 , mathematics Weight: 0.73 , quantum physics Weight: 0.71 , meteorology Weight: 0.70

science: be in technology

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible