science: be related to history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to history 1.00
has time history 0.88
be related 0.85
is related 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(core, be related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, be related to history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(core, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(core, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(core, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(science, be related to history)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(meteorology, be related)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(science, be related to history)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(science, has time history)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(science, has time history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, is related)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, has time history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(science, has time history)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(science, be related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(science, is related)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(science, is related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(science, is related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(science, be related to history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(core, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meteorology, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(science, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(core, be related)