science: be related to mathematics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to mathematics 1.00
be related to science 0.86
relate to science 0.82
be different from geography as science 0.81
be different from geography as social science 0.81
is science 0.81
be related to political science 0.81
be used in science 0.81
be like economics less precise than hard sciences like physics 0.80
be related to earth science 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(science, be related to mathematics)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(science, be related to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(science, be related to mathematics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)