science: be related to technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to technology 1.00
be in technology related 1.00
be in technology 0.93
be used in technology 0.91
affect technology 0.91
relate to technology 0.89
relate with technology 0.89
be different from technology 0.89
contribute to technology 0.86
be related to technolgy 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, be related to technology)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be in technology)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, affect technology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate to technology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate with technology)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(science, be different from technology)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, contribute to technology)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be in technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, affect technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate to technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate with technology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, contribute to technology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, be in technology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(science, be used in technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, affect technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(science, be used in technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate to technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate with technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be in technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(science, be different from technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, contribute to technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, affect technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(science, relate to technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, relate with technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(science, contribute to technology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(science, be different from technology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(science, be different from technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(science, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)