science: improve technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve technology 1.00
affect technology 0.88
be in technology 0.86
contribute to technology 0.86
be used in technology 0.84
be different from technology 0.83
be in technology related 0.82
be related to technology 0.82
depend on technology 0.82
relate to technology 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(science, improve technology)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, affect technology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be in technology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, contribute to technology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(science, be different from technology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, depend on technology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate to technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, affect technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be in technology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, contribute to technology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, depend on technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, affect technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate to technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, be in technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, contribute to technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(science, be used in technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(science, be used in technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, affect technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(science, depend on technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, be related to technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be in technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(science, be different from technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate to technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(science, contribute to technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(science, depend on technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be related to technology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(science, relate to technology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(science, be different from technology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(science, be different from technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, improve technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(science, improve technology)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(science, improve technology)