science: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful 0.99
is helpful 0.90
be helpful 0.89
be helpful to life 0.86
be helpful to society 0.81
is beneficial 0.81
be beneficial 0.80
be helpful to daily life 0.79
be beneficial to things 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be helpful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(metaphysics, is useful)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is useful)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be helpful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mathematics, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(metaphysics, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(metaphysics, is useful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(computer science, be helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer science, be helpful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(meteorology, be helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be helpful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(science, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, be useful)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(science, be helpful to life)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(science, be useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be beneficial to things)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(science, be useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(science, be useful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(science, be helpful to life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(science, be beneficial to things)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(science, be beneficial to things)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(science, be beneficial to things)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(science, be helpful to life)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(science, be helpful to life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(science, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(computer science, be helpful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mathematics, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(metaphysics, is useful)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(meteorology, be helpful)