scientist: perfect concept

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents researcher
Weight: 0.70
, author
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.68
, activist
Weight: 0.66
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.74
, physicist
Weight: 0.74
, meteorologist
Weight: 0.72
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.72
, geologist
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
perfect concept 1.00
perfect theory 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(physicist, perfect theory)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(physicist, perfect theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(physicist, perfect theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(scientist, perfect concept)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scientist, perfect theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(scientist, perfect theory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(scientist, perfect theory)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scientist, perfect theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scientist, perfect concept)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scientist, perfect concept)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scientist, perfect concept) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(physicist, perfect theory)