scientist: question that theory with new observation

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents researcher
Weight: 0.70
, author
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.68
, activist
Weight: 0.66
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.74
, physicist
Weight: 0.74
, meteorologist
Weight: 0.72
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.72
, geologist
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
question that theory with new observation 1.00
question that theory 0.94
question theory 0.92
prove theory 0.84
wants to test his hypothesis 0.84
perfect theory 0.82
answer that question 0.81
answer lot of question 0.79
answer question 0.79
make tentative hypothesis 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(expert, answer question)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(expert, answer that question)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(physicist, make tentative hypothesis)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(physicist, prove theory)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(physicist, perfect theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(physicist, prove theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(physicist, prove theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(physicist, perfect theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(physicist, perfect theory)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(physicist, make tentative hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(physicist, make tentative hypothesis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(scientist, question that theory with new observation)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scientist, wants to test his hypothesis)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(scientist, question theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scientist, perfect theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(scientist, question theory)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scientist, question that theory)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(scientist, wants to test his hypothesis)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(scientist, question theory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(scientist, perfect theory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(scientist, perfect theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scientist, perfect theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(scientist, wants to test his hypothesis)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scientist, wants to test his hypothesis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(physicist, perfect theory)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(physicist, prove theory)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(physicist, make tentative hypothesis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)