scissors: be poor cutting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, necessity
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings razor blade
Weight: 0.36
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.36
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, butter knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor cutting 1.00
cutting through alfoil 0.89
cut 0.84
cut things 0.81
cut in line 0.80
cut paper 0.78
cut in straight line 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(scissors, be poor cutting)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(scissors, cut)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut things)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scissors, cut)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(scissors, cut things)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut in line)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut paper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(scissors, cut paper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scissors, cut things)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scissors, cut paper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut paper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(scissors, cut in line)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(scissors, cut in line)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut in line)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(scissors, be poor cutting)