scissors: cutting through alfoil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, necessity
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings razor blade
Weight: 0.36
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.36
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, butter knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cutting through alfoil 1.00
be poor cutting 0.89
cut 0.85
cut in line 0.82
cut things 0.81
cut paper 0.80
cut in straight line 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(scissors, cut)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(scissors, cut things)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut paper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(scissors, cut paper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut in line)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut things)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scissors, cut)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scissors, cut paper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scissors, cut things)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(scissors, cut in line)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut paper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(scissors, be poor cutting)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut things)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut in line)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scissors, cut in straight line)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(scissors, cut in line)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(scissors, be poor cutting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)