scissors: has physical part teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, necessity
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings razor blade
Weight: 0.36
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.36
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, butter knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part teeth 1.00
has physical part quick 0.80
has physical part blades 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, has physical part quick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(scissors, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(scissors, has physical part quick)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(scissors, has physical part quick)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(scissors, has physical part blades)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(scissors, has physical part blades)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(scissors, has physical part quick)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(scissors, has physical part blades)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(scissors, has physical part blades)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(scissors, has physical part quick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(scissors, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(scissors, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(scissors, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, has physical part quick)